tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5968355124473522212.post7352166927536232571..comments2024-01-03T23:03:57.300+02:00Comments on Nibble Stew: A list of common Meson antipatternsJussihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03370287682352908292noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5968355124473522212.post-73061639001690968172017-05-15T14:42:33.907+03:002017-05-15T14:42:33.907+03:00I read about the Canadian Cross concept in https:/...I read about the Canadian Cross concept in https://sourceware.org/autobook/autobook/autobook_139.html a long time ago and think it's a good explanation. That book is long since obsolete, but the cross compiling discussion still stands.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10938137874975400711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5968355124473522212.post-58564233388836034762017-05-12T07:50:26.559+03:002017-05-12T07:50:26.559+03:00Just remember that target is mostly for crosscompi...Just remember that target is mostly for crosscompilers (if you compile GCC for crosscompiling). It's the architecture that the crosscompiler will generate. And host is the architecture where the compiler can be run. Of course, build is always the architecture of the build machine.<br /><br />With a common app, just ignore target because it's not used.Sky13https://www.blogger.com/profile/18008401820555344457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5968355124473522212.post-51101802089499697702017-05-09T23:07:00.296+03:002017-05-09T23:07:00.296+03:00The build/target/host terminology is by the way re...The build/target/host terminology is by the way really confusing. Even the linked Wikipedia page contradicts itself in the Dreamcast example and claims that the machine running the compiler is host and the machine that executes the result is target (which is also what I thought before reading this).Kuhankeittäjähttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440179726891692524noreply@blogger.com